#10339: Simplify spkg/pipestatus
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  jdemeyer  |       Owner:  GeorgSWeber        
       Type:  defect    |      Status:  new                
   Priority:  major     |   Milestone:  sage-4.6.1         
  Component:  build     |    Keywords:  pipestatus Makefile
     Author:            |    Upstream:  N/A                
   Reviewer:            |      Merged:                     
Work_issues:            |  
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------

Comment(by GeorgSWeber):

 Replying to [comment:8 leif]:
 > Replying to [comment:6 jdemeyer]:
 > > Replying to [comment:1 leif]:
 > > > IMHO Bash 3.0 is old enough to make it a prerequisite anyway.
 > >
 > > -1 to this idea, since OS X 10.4 has bash version 2.
 >
 > I don't care about it since it is dead old and only causes problems. If
 someone is able to build Sage on MacOS X 10.4, Bash 3.x or 4.x should also
 build, be it an optional Sage package for boot-strapping.
 >
 Well, there are people that do care about OS X 10.4. Since (at least)
 Sage-3.4 till the current Sage-4.6.alpha2, this is an officially supported
 platform with the regular binary distributions. If Harald (who is able to
 look at the statistics) tells me nobody downloads these anymore, I'll stop
 providing them. OTOH, the inclusion of bash as a Sage dependency has been
 discussed before. (Mainly due to the problems if the system bash is built
 to use readline as dynamic librariy, and blows up if the readline lib
 provided by Sage is older, but is found first in the library search path
 due to the Sage specific LD_LIBRARY_PATH settings, as e.g. in Arch Linux
 and younger SuSE distributions.)
 But the conclusion was always that we don't want to have bash as a core
 dependency to be shipped with Sage (be it only for a few OSes).

 Cheers,
 Georg

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10339#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to