#8800: Doctest coverage of categories - numerous coercion fixes
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner: Simon King
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6.1
Component: categories | Keywords: categories doctests
Author: Simon King | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment(by lftabera):
I got the same error in permgroup.py in both 32 and 64 bits. I got the
permutation (1,2)(4,5) in two different machines with 4.6 + patches from
this ticket.
We can investigate further what is going on, but I do not like this kind
of tests against random_element. Even if we use the same seed. Is there a
policy to deal with random_element methods?
What about something like?
{{{
sage: a= G.random_element()
sage: a in G
True
sage: a.parent() is G
True
sage: a**6
()
}}}
About the errors in number_field all tests passes in 64 bits but I get the
same errors as John in 32 bits. Concerning selmer group. Are both results
right or only one of them?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8800#comment:47>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
