#10369: Yet another bug in factorization over number fields
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  lftabera       |       Owner:  tbd                         
       Type:  defect         |      Status:  new                         
   Priority:  critical       |   Milestone:  sage-4.6.2                  
  Component:  factorization  |    Keywords:  factorization, number fields
     Author:                 |    Upstream:  N/A                         
   Reviewer:                 |      Merged:                              
Work_issues:                 |  
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------

Old description:

> I have found several issues factoring polynomials over number fields.
> This time pari seems to work ok, so it is not related to #10279
>

> {{{
> sage: N.<a>=NumberField(x^6+x^5+x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1)
> sage: K.<t>=N[]
> sage: l = (-1/7*a^5 - 1/7*a^4 - 1/7*a^3 - 1/7*a^2 - 2/7*a - 1/7)*t^10 +
> (4/7*a^5 - 2/7*a^4 - 2/7*a^3 - 2/7*a^2 - 2/7*a - 6/7)*t^9 + (90/49*a^5 +
> 152/49*a^4 + 18/49*a^3 + 24/49*a^2 + 30/49*a + 36/49)*t^8 + (-10/49*a^5 +
> 10/7*a^4 + 198/49*a^3 - 102/49*a^2 - 60/49*a - 26/49)*t^7 + (40/49*a^5 +
> 45/49*a^4 + 60/49*a^3 + 277/49*a^2 - 204/49*a - 78/49)*t^6 + (90/49*a^5 +
> 110/49*a^4 + 2*a^3 + 80/49*a^2 + 46/7*a - 30/7)*t^5 + (30/7*a^5 +
> 260/49*a^4 + 250/49*a^3 + 232/49*a^2 + 32/7*a + 8)*t^4 + (-184/49*a^5 -
> 58/49*a^4 - 52/49*a^3 - 66/49*a^2 - 72/49*a - 72/49)*t^3 + (18/49*a^5 -
> 32/49*a^4 + 10/49*a^3 + 4/49*a^2)*t^2 + (2/49*a^4 - 4/49*a^3 +
> 2/49*a^2)*t
> sage: factor(l)
> }}}
>
> Depending on the execution I get two answers
>
> wrong answer:
>
> {{{
> (-1/7*a^5 - 1/7*a^4 - 1/7*a^3 - 1/7*a^2 - 2/7*a - 1/7) * t^4 * (t^6 +
> (-19/7*a^5 - 17/7*a^4 - 15/7*a^3 - 13/7*a^2 - 11/7*a - 9/7)*t^5 + (2*a^5
> - 10/7*a^4 - 16/7*a^3 + 10/7*a^2 - 2/7*a + 18/7)*t^4 + (-40/7*a^5 -
> 8/7*a^4 - 40/7*a^3 - 48/7*a^2 - 32/7)*t^3 + (26/7*a^5 - 6/7*a^4 +
> 26/7*a^3 - 6/7*a^2 - 4/7*a + 34/7)*t^2 + (-20/7*a^5 - 4/7*a^4 - 20/7*a^3
> - 4/7*a^2 - 20/7*a - 16/7)*t + 2/7*a^5 - 2/7*a^4 + 2/7*a^3 - 2/7*a^2 +
> 2/7*a - 2/7)
> }}}
>
> solution that looks right:
>
> {{{
> (-1/7*a^5 - 1/7*a^4 - 1/7*a^3 - 1/7*a^2 - 2/7*a - 1/7) * t * (t - a^5 -
> a^4 - a^3 - a^2 - a - 1)^4 * (t^5 + (-12/7*a^5 - 10/7*a^4 - 8/7*a^3 -
> 6/7*a^2 - 4/7*a - 2/7)*t^4 + (12/7*a^5 - 8/7*a^3 + 16/7*a^2 + 2/7*a +
> 20/7)*t^3 + (-20/7*a^5 - 20/7*a^3 - 20/7*a^2 + 4/7*a - 2)*t^2 + (12/7*a^5
> + 12/7*a^3 + 2/7*a + 16/7)*t - 4/7*a^5 - 4/7*a^3 - 4/7*a - 2/7)
> }}}
>
> With pari I only get the second answer, so it looks like a sage problem.
>
> Next example is different:
>
> {{{
> sage: l2 = (-1/7*a^5 - 1/7*a^4 - 1/7*a^3 - 1/7*a^2 - 2/7*a - 1/7)*t^10 +
> (4/7*a^5 - 2/7*a^4 - 2/7*a^3 - 2/7*a^2 - 2/7*a - 6/7)*t^9 + (90/49*a^5 +
> 152/49*a^4 + 18/49*a^3 + 24/49*a^2 + 30/49*a + 36/49)*t^8 + (-10/49*a^5 +
> 10/7*a^4 + 198/49*a^3 - 102/49*a^2 - 60/49*a - 26/49)*t^7 + (40/49*a^5 +
> 45/49*a^4 + 60/49*a^3 + 277/49*a^2 - 204/49*a - 78/49)*t^6 + (90/49*a^5 +
> 110/49*a^4 + 2*a^3 + 80/49*a^2 + 46/7*a - 30/7)*t^5 + (30/7*a^5 +
> 260/49*a^4 + 250/49*a^3 + 232/49*a^2 + 32/7*a + 8)*t^4 + (-184/49*a^5 -
> 58/49*a^4 - 52/49*a^3 - 66/49*a^2 - 72/49*a - 72/49)*t^3 + (18/49*a^5 -
> 32/49*a^4 + 10/49*a^3 + 4/49*a^2)*t^2 + (2/49*a^4 - 4/49*a^3 +
> 2/49*a^2)*t
> }}}
>
> The pari released with sage computes the factorization without problems,
> but trying to compute the factorization with sage the program starts to
> eat all available ram and you have to kill the program.

New description:

 I have found several issues factoring polynomials over number fields. This
 time pari seems to work ok, so it is not related to #10279


 {{{
 sage: N.<a>=NumberField(x^6+x^5+x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1)
 sage: K.<t>=N[]
 sage: l = (-1/7*a^5 - 1/7*a^4 - 1/7*a^3 - 1/7*a^2 - 2/7*a - 1/7)*t^10 +
 (4/7*a^5 - 2/7*a^4 - 2/7*a^3 - 2/7*a^2 - 2/7*a - 6/7)*t^9 + (90/49*a^5 +
 152/49*a^4 + 18/49*a^3 + 24/49*a^2 + 30/49*a + 36/49)*t^8 + (-10/49*a^5 +
 10/7*a^4 + 198/49*a^3 - 102/49*a^2 - 60/49*a - 26/49)*t^7 + (40/49*a^5 +
 45/49*a^4 + 60/49*a^3 + 277/49*a^2 - 204/49*a - 78/49)*t^6 + (90/49*a^5 +
 110/49*a^4 + 2*a^3 + 80/49*a^2 + 46/7*a - 30/7)*t^5 + (30/7*a^5 +
 260/49*a^4 + 250/49*a^3 + 232/49*a^2 + 32/7*a + 8)*t^4 + (-184/49*a^5 -
 58/49*a^4 - 52/49*a^3 - 66/49*a^2 - 72/49*a - 72/49)*t^3 + (18/49*a^5 -
 32/49*a^4 + 10/49*a^3 + 4/49*a^2)*t^2 + (2/49*a^4 - 4/49*a^3 + 2/49*a^2)*t
 sage: factor(l)
 }}}

 Depending on the execution I get two answers

 wrong answer:

 {{{
 (-1/7*a^5 - 1/7*a^4 - 1/7*a^3 - 1/7*a^2 - 2/7*a - 1/7) * t^4 * (t^6 +
 (-19/7*a^5 - 17/7*a^4 - 15/7*a^3 - 13/7*a^2 - 11/7*a - 9/7)*t^5 + (2*a^5 -
 10/7*a^4 - 16/7*a^3 + 10/7*a^2 - 2/7*a + 18/7)*t^4 + (-40/7*a^5 - 8/7*a^4
 - 40/7*a^3 - 48/7*a^2 - 32/7)*t^3 + (26/7*a^5 - 6/7*a^4 + 26/7*a^3 -
 6/7*a^2 - 4/7*a + 34/7)*t^2 + (-20/7*a^5 - 4/7*a^4 - 20/7*a^3 - 4/7*a^2 -
 20/7*a - 16/7)*t + 2/7*a^5 - 2/7*a^4 + 2/7*a^3 - 2/7*a^2 + 2/7*a - 2/7)
 }}}

 solution that looks right:

 {{{
 (-1/7*a^5 - 1/7*a^4 - 1/7*a^3 - 1/7*a^2 - 2/7*a - 1/7) * t * (t - a^5 -
 a^4 - a^3 - a^2 - a - 1)^4 * (t^5 + (-12/7*a^5 - 10/7*a^4 - 8/7*a^3 -
 6/7*a^2 - 4/7*a - 2/7)*t^4 + (12/7*a^5 - 8/7*a^3 + 16/7*a^2 + 2/7*a +
 20/7)*t^3 + (-20/7*a^5 - 20/7*a^3 - 20/7*a^2 + 4/7*a - 2)*t^2 + (12/7*a^5
 + 12/7*a^3 + 2/7*a + 16/7)*t - 4/7*a^5 - 4/7*a^3 - 4/7*a - 2/7)
 }}}

 With pari I only get the second answer, so it looks like a sage problem.

 Next example is different:

 {{{
 sage: l2 = (1/7*a^2 - 1/7*a)*t^10 + (4/7*a - 6/7)*t^9 + (102/49*a^5 +
 99/49*a^4 + 96/49*a^3 + 93/49*a^2 + 90/49*a + 150/49)*t^8 + (-160/49*a^5 -
 36/49*a^4 - 48/49*a^3 - 8/7*a^2 - 60/49*a - 60/49)*t^7 + (30/49*a^5 -
 55/49*a^4 + 20/49*a^3 + 5/49*a^2)*t^6 + (6/49*a^4 - 12/49*a^3 +
 6/49*a^2)*t^5
 }}}

 It is t**5 times an ireducible polynomial. With the Gp pari released with
 sage computes the factorization without problems, but trying to compute
 the factorization with sage the program starts to eat all available ram
 and you have to kill the program.

--

Comment(by lftabera):

 Interesting, I was not able to reproduce the problem in gp. But being a
 pari bug makes sense.

 I have corrected the second example, with gp I have no problems to factor
 the polynomial. Maybe the problem is with libpari.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10369#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to