#10677: Improve PARI interface for relative number fields
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  jdemeyer        |       Owner:  davidloeffler
       Type:  enhancement     |      Status:  needs_review 
   Priority:  major           |   Milestone:  sage-4.6.2   
  Component:  number fields   |    Keywords:  pari rnf     
     Author:  Jeroen Demeyer  |    Upstream:  N/A          
   Reviewer:                  |      Merged:               
Work_issues:                  |  
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Changes (by mstreng):

 * cc: mstreng, jdemeyer (added)


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:4 mstreng]:
 > Could you add doctests for {{{get_nf(self)}}}?
 (these would be implicit doctests I suppose)

 Related to this: the documentation of {{{get_nf}}} seems to be more
 detailed than that of {{{nf_get_pol}}}. In particular, the documentation
 of {{{nf_get_pol}}} doesn't say that only nfinit, bnfinit and bnrinit are
 allowed (which I think it should). A doctest showing the error message for
 an rnfinit object would be useful.

 I think doctests showing that these functions work for bnfinit and rnfinit
 would be good too.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10677#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to