#7377: Symbolic Ring to Maxima via EclObject
-----------------------------------------------------------------------+----
Reporter: nbruin |
Owner: nbruin
Type: enhancement |
Status: needs_work
Priority: major |
Milestone: sage-feature
Component: symbolics |
Keywords:
Author: Nils Bruin, Jean-Pierre Flori |
Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Jean-Pierre Flori, François Bissey, Karl-Dieter Crisman |
Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------+----
Comment(by kcrisman):
There are tickets with three times as many comments, and I have never
heard that complaint before. If a ticket causes a regression - and this
is one, if slight - then that should be dealt with appropriately on that
ticket.
If one insists that it is not relevant, or that it should not hold up a
valuable improvement, then it would seem courteous for the person who
believes it no longer belongs on that ticket to open a followup ticket
along with relevant links to the discussion on the previous ticket. Given
the work that has gone into this, that might be appropriate, but it seems
to me it could also be dealt with on this one.
As to the error report, it doesn't always make it go away, sure. This is
because some integration problems are just hard, and because Maxima can't
do all the ones that might not be hard, and because Maxima's assumption
framework is in fact weak, as they always say. It doesn't really seem any
sillier than Maxima asking a million questions all to come up with the
same answer.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7377#comment:102>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
