#10848: Checks for Hermitian matrices
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: rbeezer | Owner: jason, was
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: linear algebra | Keywords:
Author: Rob Beezer | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment(by rbeezer):
Replying to [comment:4 jason]:
> Can you clarify this statement? "For numerical matrices a specialized
routine available over ``RDF`` and ``CDF`` is a good choice. " When I
read it, I'm not sure what it means---should I program my own routine?
Yes, that could be improved (and I used the same thing on some other
ticket). What I was trying to convey was the idea that RDF/CDF are better
for numerical work than RR/CC. There are many methods designed for exact
rings that get applied to RDF/CDF/RR/CC, and I am hoping to improve the
situation for RDF/CDF, thus an effort to steer folks there. Maybe I
should just say that outright, plus mention the tolerance option as you
have suggested.
I'll have a new patch up later today.
> Maybe you could change it to: "For numerical matrices over ``RDF`` or
``CDF``, the tolerance for comparison can also be specified (see
~REFERENCE)."
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10848#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
