#10848: Checks for Hermitian matrices
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: rbeezer | Owner: jason, was
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: linear algebra | Keywords:
Author: Rob Beezer | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment(by rbeezer):
Replying to [comment:4 jason]:
> Can you clarify this statement?
Does this sound better? Let me know and I'll replicate into
{{{is_unitary}}}.
{{{
This routine is for matrices over exact rings and so may not
work properly for matrices over ``RR`` or ``CC``. For matrices
with
approximate entries, the rings of double-precision floating-point
numbers, ``RDF`` and ``CDF``, are a better choice since the
:meth:`sage.matrix.matrix_double_dense.Matrix_double_dense.is_hermitian`
method has a tolerance parameter. This provides control over
allowing for minor discrepancies between entries when checking
equality.
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10848#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
