#7870: dozens of failures in magma optional test suite on skynet (eno) with
sage-4.3
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: cremona
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7
Component: interfaces | Keywords: Magma
Author: William Stein, John Cremona | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Martin Raum, John Cremona | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Comment(by drkirkby):
Replying to [comment:19 jdemeyer]:
> Replying to [comment:16 mraum]:
> > For the record, the patchbot and the release manager:
> >
> > Apply trac_7870-magma-doctest.patch
> > Apply trac-7870-magma-doctest-review.patch
>
> '''Please''' in the future write this in the ticket '''description'''.
Thanks!
That makes a lot of sence and should probably be put in some sort of guide
to using trac. Is there one specifically for Sage?
I know I came unstuck recently when I put a link to an spkg in the
description, but that spkg needed tekinfo (or whatever it was), so
Francois posted one which did not need it. But mine was in the
description, his one was less prominently placed in the notes, so you used
mine and found it did not work.
At the very least, specifying the locations of .spkgs and what patches
needed to be applied, should be mentioned on sage-devel, but ideally we
need it documented on the trac server.
Dave
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7870#comment:20>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.