#10792: Upgrade numpy to 1.5.1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+--
   Reporter:  jason                                                      |      
 Owner:  tbd       
       Type:  task                                                       |      
Status:  needs_work
   Priority:  major                                                      |   
Milestone:  sage-4.7  
  Component:  packages                                                   |    
Keywords:            
     Author:  Jason Grout                                                |    
Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:  David Kirkby                                               |      
Merged:            
Work_issues:  doctest changes for patch, verify a couple analytic cases  |  
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+--
Changes (by newvalueoldvalue):

  * status:  needs_info => needs_work
  * work_issues:  => doctest changes for patch, verify a couple analytic
                  cases
  * author:  => Jason Grout


Comment:

 Ethan, I think you are too hard on yourself with saying 'the last two
 doctests are significant failures', as the previous ones did not end in
 `j`, but in `e-xyj`.  In both cases that means the change in values are
 just as small as for the other ones.
 {{{
 sage:             sage: m.riemann_map(0.4)  # long time
 (0.73324267718245451+3.5076771459132302e-06j)
 sage:             sage: import numpy as np  # long time
 sage:             sage: m.riemann_map(np.complex(-3, 0.0001))  # long time
 (1.4057571354958995e-05+1.051061653044145e-09j)
 }}}
 Is there any way to check for that pattern in a doctest?  It would be
 convenient to guard against what Ethan thought was happening.

 Updating the work issues.  We still need
  * doctest change for Jason's patch
  * some type of confirmation of one or two analytic examples of this

 Though in my opinion, this second one could be moved to #10821, since the
 problem was there before.

 Also, seeing this made me look through riemann.pyx, and it turns out that
 file could use some general TLC. Esp. with regard to a few doc things and
 some fairly massive redundancy with complex plots. See #10945.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10792#comment:28>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to