#10888: problem in evaluation dual isogeny
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: wuthrich | Owner: cremona
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7
Component: elliptic curves | Keywords: isogenies,
Author: wuthrich | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Changes (by newvalueoldvalue):
* status: new => needs_review
* milestone: => sage-4.7
* author: => wuthrich
Comment:
From the discussion on sage-devel, I learned that I should not change the
functioning of evaluation in this ticket. To solve the bug in the
isogenies, I simply make the evaluations in the code to be evaluations
without keywords. Then it is no longer ambiguous.
I will open another ticket about the issue with evaluation and
substitution.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10888#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
