#9944: categories for polynomial rings
----------------------------------------------+-----------------------------
Reporter: robertwb | Owner: nthiery
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7
Component: categories | Keywords:
Author: Robert Bradshaw | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Nicolas M. Thiéry, Mike Hansen | Merged:
Work_issues: Fix one test |
----------------------------------------------+-----------------------------
Old description:
> Currently, they're always just commutative rings.
>
> '''Apply:'''
> 1. [attachment:9944-poly-cat.patch]
> 2. [attachment:9944-poly-cat-doctests.patch]
> 3. [attachment:trac-9944-poly-cat-review.patch]
New description:
Currently, they're always just commutative rings.
'''Apply:'''
1. [attachment:9944-poly-cat.patch]
2. [attachment:9944-poly-cat-doctests.patch]
3. [attachment:trac-9944-poly-cat-review.patch]
4. [attachment:trac9944_second_referee.patch]
--
Comment(by SimonKing):
I attached a small patch to solve part of the problem of the missing
parent initialisation: I call `Parent.__init__` and
`ParentWithGens.__init__` explicitly, during initialisation of a ring. In
that way, the `__init_extra__` methods are correctly picked up.
However, that does not solve the performance problem.
Question one: How can one come to speed?
Question two: Is my patch really trivial enough to be called a referee
patch?
For the patchbot:
Apply 9944-poly-cat.patch 9944-poly-cat-doctests.patch trac-9944-poly-cat-
review.patch trac9944_second_referee.patch
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9944#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
