#11081: Update the "Install from Source Code" section of the Sage Installation
Guide
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
   Reporter:  drkirkby             |       Owner:  mvngu     
       Type:  enhancement          |      Status:  needs_work
   Priority:  major                |   Milestone:  sage-4.7  
  Component:  documentation        |    Keywords:            
     Author:  David Kirkby         |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:  Karl-Dieter Crisman  |      Merged:            
Work_issues:                       |  
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------

Comment(by kcrisman):

 > >  * A minor note should be added that gfortran is not provided by Xcode
 on OS X, but that Sage provides a suitable Fortran compiler for OS X.
 >
 > I can add that, though the current documentation does say in this very
 file:
 >
 > ''On Mac OS X, you are not required to have a Fortran compiler on your
 system. The Sage source distribution is shipped with a Fortran compiler
 for Mac OS X. This Fortran compiler is used, unless you specify another
 Fortran compiler via the variable SAGE_FORTRAN.''

 Is it anywhere near where your thing is?  My concern was people on OS X
 thinking they needed to get/had gfortran.

 > >  * Even for my ancient < 1 GHz Emac (probably from around 2003), it
 takes less than a minute for Sage to start up the first time (though it's
 close!).  I think it is more reasonable to say "starting the first time
 may take more than a few seconds; a few platforms will take longer for
 reason X" where it is clear that reason X is something about the platform,
 not Sage.
 >
 > I hear plenty of complaints on sage-devel of Sage taking a very long
 time to start.

 They mean >5 sec, or >2 sec. on a fresh cache.  Not minutes.  Anyway,
 there are very few systems, I think, where 'minutes' is the right word,
 and we don't want to scare people.

 > >  * "**Note from David Kirkby.** " - is that going to look ok in the
 docs?  Maybe instead using the ".. note:" syntax...
 >
 > In my opinion it looked ok, but perhaps I'm biased. I don't know how to
 use the ''note syntax''. I wanted to make this quite prominent, as I think
 its a pretty important point. We are documenting how to do something that
 any decent system administer knows one should never do.
 I haven't looked at it in the doc yet, so we'll see when we get there.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11081#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to