#9976: Decorated functions/methods have generic signature in documentation
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: jsrn | Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7
Component: documentation | Keywords: sphinx, documentation, cython
inspection
Author: jsrn, Simon King | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Comment(by jsrn):
>
> So, I guess a better plan is to explicitly test (using `inspect.isclass`
and whether we want the first argument to be stripped:
> {{{
> sage: import inspect
> sage: inspect.isclass(QQ.__class__)
> True
> sage: sage.misc.sageinspect.isclassinstance(QQ)
> True
> }}}
>
> This is what I will replace the "`except TypeError`" with.
That sounds good. I guess we do not want this stripping down in
sage_getargspec.
I'll look into whether sage_getargspec already implements the logic in
sage_autodoc that I was trying to avoid duplicating when inventing
_sage_getargspec.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9976#comment:41>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.