#10296: Singular interface wasting time by waiting for the prompt too often
--------------------------------------------------------------------+-------
 Reporter:  SimonKing                                               |         
Owner:  was            
     Type:  enhancement                                             |        
Status:  closed         
 Priority:  major                                                   |     
Milestone:  sage-4.7.1     
Component:  interfaces                                              |    
Resolution:  fixed          
 Keywords:  Singular, _eval_line, synchronization, synchronisation  |        
Author:  Simon King     
 Upstream:  N/A                                                     |      
Reviewer:  Martin Albrecht
   Merged:  sage-4.7.1.alpha0                                       |   
Work_issues:                 
--------------------------------------------------------------------+-------

Comment(by jpflori):

 I've ran more than 100 tests of expect.py and gap.py without "timeout=1"
 (so using the default value of timeout=0.3) on Sage 4.7.alpha3 + #7377 +
 #10818 + #10296, built from scratch on debian unstable/experimental amd64,
 intel core 2 quad, and everything passed.

 By the way, hg failed to apply the patch, I had to manually apply the
 following hunk:

 {{{
 --- gap.py
 +++ gap.py
 @@ -475,46 +532,45 @@

 }}}
 The only difference is that the tests are obviously longer with a greater
 value of timeout.

 Could anyone else check whether the default value of timeout gives a
 random behavior, at least as often as every two times?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10296#comment:27>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to