#10296: Singular interface wasting time by waiting for the prompt too often
--------------------------------------------------------------------+-------
 Reporter:  SimonKing                                               |         
Owner:  was            
     Type:  enhancement                                             |        
Status:  closed         
 Priority:  major                                                   |     
Milestone:  sage-4.7.1     
Component:  interfaces                                              |    
Resolution:  fixed          
 Keywords:  Singular, _eval_line, synchronization, synchronisation  |        
Author:  Simon King     
 Upstream:  N/A                                                     |      
Reviewer:  Martin Albrecht
   Merged:  sage-4.7.1.alpha0                                       |   
Work_issues:                 
--------------------------------------------------------------------+-------

Comment(by SimonKing):

 Replying to [comment:27 jpflori]:
 > I've ran more than 100 tests of expect.py and gap.py without "timeout=1"
 (so using the default value of timeout=0.3) on Sage 4.7.alpha3 + #7377 +
 #10818 + #10296, built from scratch on debian unstable/experimental amd64,
 intel core 2 quad, and everything passed.

 Quite a relief...

 I have Debian GNU/Linux squeeze/sid, and I think our administrator did
 patch the kernel in order to make pseudo-Tty faster. The reason is that,
 without that kernel patch, the overhead of all pexpect interfaces is
 abundant. It is, of course, imaginable that the kernel patch is
 responsible for the flaky behaviour of the test on my machine.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10296#comment:28>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to