#11287: Interface to runsnake and import_statements
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner: tbd
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7.1
Component: performance | Keywords: runsnake, prun,
profiling, days30
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Franco Saliola, Simon King | Author: Nicolas M. Thiéry
Merged: | Dependencies:
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Comment(by SimonKing):
I just opened #11298 (ready for review).
With it, we obtain:
{{{
sage: from sage.misc.sageinspect import sage_getsourcelines, sage_getfile
sage: P.<x,y> = QQ[]
sage: P._init_category_(Algebras(QQ))
sage: P.__module__
'sage.categories.algebras'
sage: sage_getfile(P)
'/mnt/local/king/SAGE/sage-4.7.alpha5/devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx'
sage: lines, lineno = sage_getsourcelines(P)
sage: lines[0]
'cdef class MPolynomialRing_libsingular(MPolynomialRing_generic):\n'
}}}
It should be easy to extract the module name from the file name (here:
`sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial_libsingular`, not
`sage.categories.algebras`). Moreover, it should be easy to extract the
correct class name from the first line of the source code (`ClassName`,
not `ClassName_with_category` or `SomeCategory.parent_class`, which would
not work in an import statement).
Cheers,
Simon
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11287#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
