#11301: empty partition causes error for up_list
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: saliola | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7.1
Component: combinatorics | Keywords: combinat, partitions, days30
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Franco Saliola | Author: Jason Bandlow
Merged: | Dependencies: #11300
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment(by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:4 hivert]:
> Replying to [comment:3 saliola]:
>
> Shouldn't we rename {{{up_list}}} to something more meaningful ? What
about {{{young_lattice_successors}}} ?
Ah, this is what {{{up_list}}} is about! I had no clue before that
(from the name).
+1 for renaming (with deprecation of {{{up_list}}}), either in this
patch or a followup.
For the name, for consistency with other spots (like
{{{bruhat_upper_covers}}}), we should use a name like
{{{young_upper_covers}}} or {{{young_lattice_upper_covers}}}.
You may want to raise a discussion on sage-combinat-devel to choose
between the two.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11301#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.