#11301: empty partition causes error for up_list
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  saliola         |          Owner:  sage-combinat               
       Type:  defect          |         Status:  positive_review             
   Priority:  major           |      Milestone:  sage-4.7.1                  
  Component:  combinatorics   |       Keywords:  combinat, partitions, days30
Work_issues:                  |       Upstream:  N/A                         
   Reviewer:  Franco Saliola  |         Author:  Jason Bandlow               
     Merged:                  |   Dependencies:  #11300                      
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------

Comment(by nthiery):

 Replying to [comment:4 hivert]:
 > Replying to [comment:3 saliola]:
 >
 > Shouldn't we rename {{{up_list}}} to something more meaningful ? What
 about {{{young_lattice_successors}}} ?

 Ah, this is what {{{up_list}}} is about! I had no clue before that
 (from the name).

 +1 for renaming (with deprecation of {{{up_list}}}), either in this
 patch or a followup.

 For the name, for consistency with other spots (like
 {{{bruhat_upper_covers}}}), we should use a name like
 {{{young_upper_covers}}} or {{{young_lattice_upper_covers}}}.

 You may want to raise a discussion on sage-combinat-devel to choose
 between the two.

 Cheers,
                                         Nicolas

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11301#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to