#11395: Upgrade Gfan to latest release (version 0.5)
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  mhampton     |          Owner:  tbd              
       Type:  enhancement  |         Status:  new              
   Priority:  major        |      Milestone:  sage-4.7.1       
  Component:  packages     |       Keywords:  tropical geometry
Work_issues:               |       Upstream:  N/A              
   Reviewer:               |         Author:  Marshall Hampton 
     Merged:               |   Dependencies:                   
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------

Comment(by fbissey):

 I had kind of started work on that. I am starting to hate when sage-on-
 gentoo is too much ahead and it breaks tests in non trivial ways. Most of
 the tests mentioned by Christopher are broken by trivial changes of
 formatting or ordering. But that one I think needs careful checking:
 {{{
 **********************************************************************
 File "/usr/share/sage/devel/sage-
 main/sage/rings/polynomial/groebner_fan.py", line 606:
     sage: g.weight_vectors()
 Expected:
     [(3, 7, 1), (5, 1, 2), (7, 1, 4), (1, 1, 4), (1, 1, 1), (1, 4, 1), (1,
 4, 10)]
 Got:
     [(3, 7, 1), (5, 1, 2), (7, 1, 4), (5, 1, 4), (1, 1, 1), (1, 4, 8), (1,
 4, 10)]
 **********************************************************************
 }}}
 It is not obvious that the two answers are equivalent, I was going to
 submit it to the opinion of sage-devel on Monday.

 On another note, do you know what this section of the Makefile is all
 about
 {{{
 ifeq ($(sagepath),)
 SAGE_LINKOPTIONS =
 SAGE_INCLUDEOPTIONS =
 else
 SAGE_LINKOPTIONS = -L$(sagepath)/ -lpython2.6 -lcsage -lsingular
 SAGE_INCLUDEOPTIONS = -I $(sagepath)/
 SAGE_OBJECTS = sage.o sage_link.so

 sage_link.so: sage_link.pyx setup.py
        python setup.py build_ext --inplace --pyrex-include-
 dirs=$(SAGE_ROOT)/devel/sage/
 endif
 }}}
 It is not build by default and the cython source is missing (the resulting
 .cpp is present) but it looks like someone is looking at producing their
 own sage-extension.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11395#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to