#11273: Riemann Enhancements: Docs, Exterior, Multiple Spiderweb, Error Testing
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  evanandel    |          Owner:  burcin                       
       Type:  enhancement  |         Status:  needs_review                 
   Priority:  major        |      Milestone:  sage-4.7.1                   
  Component:  calculus     |       Keywords:  riemann map                  
Work_issues:               |       Upstream:  N/A                          
   Reviewer:               |         Author:  Ethan Van Andel              
     Merged:               |   Dependencies:  #8867, #10792, #10821, #11028
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Changes (by burcin):

  * dependencies:  8867, 10792, 10821, 11028 => #8867, #10792, #10821,
                   #11028


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:1 evanandel]:

 > As a result, this ticket should replace #10945 (some of the other issues
 there have already been addressed, this just hits the documentation) and
 #10957. Is there a good way to go about doing that?

 We should close those tickets as duplicates of this one.

 The patch looks good to me. There are a few minor formatting issues:

  * lines should be <= 80 characters. The patch contains some lines with
 very aggressive wrapping, such as
  {{{
           q_vector = 1 / (
                         self.pre_q_vector - pt1)
  }}}
  and some with almost none.
  * There should be an empty line in the documentation after `::` to start
 a code block.
  * I would appreciate it if there were more comments in the code to
 explain what it's doing, but this is not a requirement.
  * attachment:trac-11273-riemann-upgrade-part2.patch cuts down the
 precision required in the doctests to 5 digits in some places. Is this
 code really so unstable? Would it help to use other functions for numeric
 approximation, other than those defined in python's `math` module?

 I am leaving this as `needs_review` since I don't consider this a full
 review. Somebody more familiar with this code should comment on the
 changes and check if this ticket does indeed replace #10945 and #10957.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11273#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to