#9138: Categories for all rings
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  jbandlow           |          Owner:  nthiery                     
                  
       Type:  defect             |         Status:  needs_work                  
                  
   Priority:  major              |      Milestone:  sage-4.7.1                  
                  
  Component:  categories         |       Keywords:  introspection, categories 
for rings           
Work_issues:  Steenrod algebras  |       Upstream:  N/A                         
                  
   Reviewer:                     |         Author:  Simon King                  
                  
     Merged:                     |   Dependencies:  sage-4.7, #11268, #11139, 
#9976, #9944, #11269
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------

Comment(by SimonKing):

 Replying to [comment:69 SimonKing]:
 > I think the easiest solution (and probably the best solution as well
 would be to replace that test by a polynomial ring over a different non-
 commutative algebra, perhaps a matrix algebra.

 Helàs.

 Matrix spaces have their custom `__getitem__` as well. But it would be
 possible to construct the polynomial ring by using the polynomial ring
 constructor:
 {{{
 sage: PolynomialRing(MatrixSpace(QQ,2),'x').category()
 Category of algebras over Full MatrixSpace of 2 by 2 dense matrices over
 Rational Field
 sage: PolynomialRing(SteenrodAlgebra(2),'x').category()
 Category of algebras over mod 2 Steenrod algebra, milnor basis
 }}}

 The other problem is in sage/algebras/steenrod/steenrod_algebra.py.: With
 the patch from here,
 {{{
             sage: A1 = SteenrodAlgebra(profile=[2,1])
             sage: A1(3)  # map integer into A1
 }}}
 returns 3 and not 1!

 That behaviour boils down to
 {{{
 sage: A1._from_dict({():3})
 3
 }}}
 Here, one should have
 {{{
 sage: A1._from_dict({():3},coerce=True)
 1
 }}}

 I don't know, though, how my patch has changed the question whether there
 is a conversion or not: The word `coerce` occurs precisely twice in my
 first patch, but that is certainly unrelated with "coerce=True" versus
 "coerce=False". Strange.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9138#comment:70>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to