#3317: a citation system for Sage components
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mhampton | Owner: mhampton
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-feature
Component: packages | Keywords: citations
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: | Dependencies:
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment(by kcrisman):
Hi! If this doesn't slow things down, it is a really good idea,
especially given that Sage is not trying to cover up the other programs
inside of it. I assume that (given the comments on the blog) you will
post timing information in critical areas eventually.
I have one substantive comment, I think:
> You'll need our pybtex-spkg in order to make it work:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/burcin/spkg/pybtex-0.15.spkg
Hmm, so does that mean we would need to make `pybtex` a standard package
in order for this to work? (Currently there is a probationary period
needed, which we have recently
[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11563 been enforcing].)
Or are you suggesting this would be an optional spkg (for now), which
means your examples would have to be optional for now?
Here follow a couple silly comments that don't actually review much, but
might still be worthwhile to ponder.
* Missing "to": `in order make it faster`
* A ''lot'' of the examples refer to Michael Brickenstein, which seems
somewhat less than advisable. I mean no disrespect here - clearly he is
contributing loads and deserves citations! But for the first-time reader
of this documentation, it would be nice to have a bigger variety of
citations, perhaps even beyond Sage components to the subcomponents. For
instance, the ones in the bibtex patch.
* What does [trac-3317-example-usage.patch] exactly have an example of?
I see the `@cites(citable_items.slimgb)` - is this demonstrating that we
get the same thing through the new decorator as we would have from
`sage.misc.citation`? This comment is probably just my ignorance
speaking, feel free to ignore it.
Good luck!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3317#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.