#11665: Don't delete built Sage documentation until Sphinx has been successfully
(re)installed
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: leif | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7.2
Component: packages | Keywords: spkg doc/output html latex
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: John Palmieri | Author: Leif Leonhardy
Merged: | Dependencies: #11659
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Changes (by leif):
* reviewer: => John Palmieri
Comment:
Replying to [comment:7 jhpalmieri]:
> Do you understand why the Sphinx installation process says "Adding
docutils 0.7 to easy-install.pth file" but doesn't actually do anything?
Well, Sphinx just uses distutils / distribute, and IIRC that prints that
message.
A problem we previously had was that packages found in Python's current
path won't get added, despite of the message (which is printed in
advance).
[[BR]]
> Otherwise, I'm happy with the changes, except that the list of
prerequisites in SPKG.txt should be changed (or explained, if it should
stay as is).
Yes, I can correct them. AFAIK a couple of spkgs have rather "random"
numbers as the minimal version of some other package required; usually
simply the current version in Sage is taken. (And not even the upstream
pages always give the correct versions required, some not even the full
list of requirements.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11665#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
