#11665: Don't delete built Sage documentation until Sphinx has been successfully
(re)installed
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: leif | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7.2
Component: packages | Keywords: spkg doc/output html latex
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: John Palmieri | Author: Leif Leonhardy
Merged: | Dependencies: #11659
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment(by jhpalmieri):
That's a bit misleading. Building the entire reference manual in one
piece takes more memory, for example, than building it in chunks — it
doesn't scale up well — so building with two threads should use less
memory, even with both threads combined, than building before the patches
at #6495. This is especially true when building in !LaTeX format, it
seems to me. Based on my anecdotal experiences: building, say, the PDF
version of the reference manual was pretty painful before the patches on
my home computer: it slowed other things down noticeably. Building after
the patches is more pleasant.
(I didn't write the description at #6495, for what that's worth.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11665#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
