#1173: implement numerical evaluation of erf at complex arguments
------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
   Reporter:  was                                                             | 
         Owner:  was         
       Type:  enhancement                                                     | 
        Status:  needs_work  
   Priority:  major                                                           | 
     Milestone:  sage-4.7.2  
  Component:  calculus                                                        | 
      Keywords:              
Work_issues:  add erf(sqrt(2)) and erf(45000).n(), formatting, perhaps speed  | 
      Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:  Burcin Erocal                                                   | 
        Author:  D. S. McNeil
     Merged:                                                                  | 
  Dependencies:  #11513      
------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Changes (by kcrisman):

  * dependencies:  => #11513


Comment:

 So, to review:
  * Burcin and I want a small formatting change so the doc would build
 correctly.
  * Burcin wants the speed to be fixed using the thing referenced at
 #11143, using the patch at #11513.
  * I want a doctest that checks big numbers will work (as in [comment:15
 comment 15]).
  * Paul and I want a doctest for #11626, to verify it is fixed.
  * Burcin ''recommends'' calling mpmath without prec as at #11143.

 This would make this depend on #11513.  I'm still a little skeptical on
 this; will we really not get any wrong answers with that?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1173#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to