#1173: implement numerical evaluation of erf at complex arguments
------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: was |
Owner: was
Type: enhancement |
Status: needs_work
Priority: major |
Milestone: sage-4.7.2
Component: calculus |
Keywords:
Work_issues: add erf(sqrt(2)) and erf(45000).n(), formatting, perhaps speed |
Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Burcin Erocal |
Author: D. S. McNeil
Merged: |
Dependencies: #11513
------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comment(by kcrisman):
Replying to [comment:19 zimmerma]:
> Replying to [comment:18 kcrisman]:
> > So, to review:
> > * I want a doctest that checks big numbers will work (as in
[comment:15 comment 15]).
> > * Paul and I want a doctest for #11626, to verify it is fixed.
>
> the current patch already contains examples with prec=100, both for real
and complex numbers,
> and thus is fine to me.
Okay. I was thinking that because was not yet a test with the syntax
{{{n(erf(2),100)}}}, which some users might find nicer than the other one,
but of course they mean the same thing. I'll leave that up to Doug, then.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1173#comment:20>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
