#4260: use LinBox as native matrix representation for dense matrices over GF(p)
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: malb | Owner: cpernet
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7.2
Component: linear algebra | Keywords: linbox, linear algebra
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author: Burcin Erocal
Merged: | Dependencies:
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Changes (by malb):
* cc: rbeezer (added)
Old description:
> Copying to and from LinBox uses up precious RAM and the point of fast
> linear algebra is to deal with large matrices. We should consider
> switching to LinBox as the native representation of matrices over GF(p)
New description:
Copying to and from LinBox uses up precious RAM and the point of fast
linear algebra is to deal with large matrices. We should consider
switching to LinBox as the native representation of matrices over GF(p)
'''Without Patch'''
{{{
!python
sage: A = random_matrix(GF(97),2000,2000)
sage: %time A*A
CPU times: user 9.66 s, sys: 0.12 s, total: 9.77 s
Wall time: 9.82 s
}}}
'''With Patch'''
{{{
!python
sage: A = random_matrix(GF(97),2000,2000)
sage: %time A*A
CPU times: user 1.32 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 1.32 s
Wall time: 1.35 s
}}}
* '''Install'''
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/malb/spkgs/linbox-1.1.6.p4.spkg
* '''Apply''' [attachment:trac_4260-linbox_default.patch]
* '''Apply''' [attachment:trac_4260-dense_ctypes_template.patch]
--
Comment:
I fixed a few issues and segfaults but the thing is far from done.
However, one can probably do higher level stuff now, i.e. it shouldn't
crash that much any more.
We need a new !LinBox SPKG because {{{Modular<float>}}} didn't have a
{{{NonZeroRandIter}}} which is needed by the charpoly code. !LinBox 1.1.7
fixes this issue but I tried unsuccessfully to upgrade to 1.1.7 for like
10 hours (cf. #11718).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4260#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.