#4260: use LinBox as native matrix representation for dense matrices over GF(p)
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
   Reporter:  malb                  |          Owner:  cpernet                  
                 
       Type:  enhancement           |         Status:  needs_review             
                 
   Priority:  major                 |      Milestone:  sage-4.7.2               
                 
  Component:  linear algebra        |       Keywords:  linbox, linear algebra, 
sd32              
Work_issues:  extend documentation  |       Upstream:  N/A                      
                 
   Reviewer:                        |         Author:  Burcin Erocal, Martin 
Albrecht, Rob Beezer
     Merged:                        |   Dependencies:                           
                 
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------

Comment(by SimonKing):

 Replying to [comment:17 malb]:
 >  * Simon, can you try again after setting {{{MAX_MODULUS}}} in
 sage.matrix.matrix_modn_dense_float to 2^6^? This forces the use of
 doubles for GF(101) which might be more efficient.

 It isn't:
 {{{
 sage: sage.matrix.matrix_modn_dense_float.MAX_MODULUS = 2^6
 sage: MS = MatrixSpace(GF(101),2000,2000)
 sage: %time A = MS.random_element()
 CPU times: user 0.21 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 0.22 s
 Wall time: 0.22 s
 sage: B = MS.random_element()
 sage: %time C = A*B
 CPU times: user 1.88 s, sys: 0.04 s, total: 1.92 s
 Wall time: 1.93 s
 sage: %time A.echelonize()
 CPU times: user 2.65 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 2.65 s
 Wall time: 2.69 s
 sage: type(A)
 <type 'sage.matrix.matrix_modn_dense_double.Matrix_modn_dense_double'>
 }}}

 > Also, how fast is {{{A.echelonize('gauss')}}} for you on that benchmark?

 You mean "how slow", I suppose:
 {{{
 sage: A = MS.random_element()
 sage: %time A.echelonize('gauss')
 CPU times: user 41.53 s, sys: 0.10 s, total: 41.63 s
 Wall time: 41.75 s
 }}}

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4260#comment:19>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to