#9958: Upgrade python to 2.7
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mhampton | Owner: tbd
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: packages | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: | Dependencies: #11156 #11236 #11244 #11264
#11339 #11363 #11376
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by strogdon):
Replying to [comment:109 fbissey]:
> Updated the first patch for polyhedra.py, split transcendental.py in its
own patch. I lowered the precision tested in the last numbers so that
results from 32 and 64 bits are not different.
Here the fix_transcendental patch fixed the associated test on x86 but now
the test fails on amd64:
{{{
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage-main/sage/functions/transcendental.py
**********************************************************************
File "/storage/sage/sage-4.7.2.alpha2/devel/sage-
main/sage/functions/transcendental.p
y", line 83:
sage: w = exponential_integral_1(2,4); w
Expected:
[0.04890051070806112, 0.0037793524098489067, 0.00036008245216265873,
3.7665622843
924...e-05]
Got:
[0.04890051070806112, 0.0037793524098489063, 0.00036008245216265873,
3.7665622843
924534e-05]
**********************************************************************
}}}
This is odd! I wonder what changed? Previously this test must have
returned ...67 and not ...63 for it to pass.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9958#comment:115>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
