#9958: Upgrade python to 2.7
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mhampton | Owner: tbd
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: packages | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: | Dependencies: #11156 #11236 #11244 #11264
#11339 #11363 #11376
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by fbissey):
Replying to [comment:106 strogdon]:
> Replying to [comment:101 fbissey]:
> > Thanks leif. Nothing worrying there. There is a patch for
sage/geometry/polyhedra.py but obviously it doesn't apply properly
anymore. transcendantal.py, randstate.pyx and intlist.pyx are all already
patched but may need more tweaking, I'd be grateful for the output of
these.
> I'm sure the polyhedra.py patch was needed at one time but it now (?)
appears that
> {{{
>
> @@ -4946,7 +4946,7 @@
> sage: proj = ProjectionFuncStereographic([1.1,1.1,1.1])
> sage: ppoints = [proj(vector(x)) for x in cube]
> sage: ppoints[0]
> - (0.0, 0.0)
> + (-1.92296268638e-15, -1.92296268638e-15)
> """
> def __init__(self, projection_point):
> """
> }}}
>
> from trac_9958-fixing_numericalnoise-part1.patch is no longer needed.
You are right I am reading the test results backwards. It now seems to go
to 0 properly. One less patch in the patch and one less worry.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9958#comment:107>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
