#11827: Documentation clarifying model used in _reduce_model and
global_minimal_model
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  dianey           |          Owner:  cremona                       
                 
       Type:  enhancement      |         Status:  new                           
                 
   Priority:  trivial          |      Milestone:  sage-4.7.2                    
                 
  Component:  elliptic curves  |       Keywords:  restricted, 
global_minimal_model, _reduce_model
Work_issues:                   |       Upstream:  N/A                           
                 
   Reviewer:                   |         Author:  dianey                        
                 
     Merged:                   |   Dependencies:                                
                 
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------

Comment(by cremona):

 Replying to [comment:2 katestange]:
 > I think it would be helpful to describe the meaning of "restricted
 model" in a sentence in the documentation also.

 I agree. "restricted type" is not standard terminology.   In my book I
 called the restricted models (over Q) "reduced" which is clear (I think!),
 but over number fields one has much more freedom:  even if there is a
 global minimal model, one can still scale by units [u,r,s,t] with r=s=t=0
 (which makes a huge difference to the appearance of the equation, even for
 real quadratic fields;  here my choice would be, given a fixed set of
 fundamental units to scale so that the Discriminant lies in a certain
 fundamental region under the standard Euclidean embedding, up to
 translation by the images of the 12'th powers of units (which act
 discretely).  I did once implement that in Magma.  And then one still has
 to reduce modulo translations ([u,r,s,t] with u=1), where the standard
 thing to do is force a1,a2,a3 to be in a fixed "small" set of residues
 modulo 2, 3, 2.

 This is tedious though not hard to implement, and then should (of course)
 be properly documented.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11827#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to