#4539: plural wrapper
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  burcin       |          Owner:  OleksandrMotsak, AlexanderDreyer
       Type:  enhancement  |         Status:  needs_work                      
   Priority:  major        |      Milestone:  sage-4.7.2                      
  Component:  algebra      |       Keywords:  libsingular plural wrapper sd34 
Work_issues:               |       Upstream:  N/A                             
   Reviewer:               |         Author:                                  
     Merged:               |   Dependencies:                                  
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------

Comment(by SimonKing):

 I have attached my experimental rebasement (relative to #7797 on top of
 sage-4.7.2.alpha3), but not all is good.

 There are quite a lot of doctest failures, including some very wrong
 arithmetical results in plural.pyx.

 Less dramatic: There are some zero division errors (for example in
 doctests of mul
 ti_polynomial_libsingular.pyx) where the expected error message was
 "rational division by zero", but now there is ''no'' error message (but
 there is a `ZeroDivisionError`, at least).

 There is a segment fault in the tests of multi_polynomial_ideal.py. I
 guess it is the same segfault that also occurs in some elliptic curves
 tests.

 Alexander, when you said that your broken Sage installation was to blame:
 Do you mean that the tests are mostly passing with your patch?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4539#comment:48>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to