#10903: Update Singular to 3-1-3-3.
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  malb      |          Owner:  tbd                                  
       
       Type:  defect    |         Status:  needs_review                         
       
   Priority:  critical  |      Milestone:  sage-4.7.2                           
       
  Component:  packages  |       Keywords:  singular SageDays34 sd34             
       
Work_issues:            |       Upstream:  N/A                                  
       
   Reviewer:            |         Author:  Burcin Erocal, Martin Albrecht, 
Volker Braun
     Merged:            |   Dependencies:  #11339                               
       
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------

Comment(by leif):

 [attachment:10903_singular-3-1-4.patch] still '''needs work''' w.r.t.
 `module_list.py`; I don't know whether all changes for Singular version
 3-1-4 (svn) equally apply to 3-1-3-3. The name of the patch should change
 anyway if we upgrade to the stable version, i.e., (currently) 3-1-3-X.

 If this spkg is to get into Sage 4.7.2, the linker issue (cf. #11769) also
 has to be fixed here. (Otherwise I'll provide a Singular 3-1-1-4.p14 spkg
 fixing just this.)

 There are other issues which may already be fixed by the new version, or
 could be fixed by incorporating upstream patches and / or making changes
 to the Sage library; see comments above (or search for other Singular-
 related tickets in case I didn't add references to all of them here... ;-)
 ).

 [[BR]]

 It would be much less confusing if everybody -- at least those
 significantly -- touching the spkg (i.e., adding changes, especially after
 ''someone else'' made such) bumped the patch level; since we apply patches
 to the vanilla upstream sources, there should (at least) be a p0 patch
 level anyway. (This applies to other spkgs as well by the way. It doesn't
 make sense to have many different spkgs with the exact same name floating
 around, even if md5sums are given, which in general isn't bad, independent
 of the former.)

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10903#comment:45>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to