#10903: Update Singular to 3-1-3-3.
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: malb | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-4.7.2
Component: packages | Keywords: singular SageDays34 sd34
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author: Burcin Erocal, Martin Albrecht,
Volker Braun
Merged: | Dependencies: #11339
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment(by leif):
Replying to [comment:46 vbraun]:
> I'm against bikeshedding `module_list.py` any further.
Well, I'd be happy if it just kept the color it had (more precisely, the
different modules kept their different colors); what Martin did is just
literally painting them all black, or brown, by mixing all the colors at
least one of them had.
What would you say if I changed the libraries in all linker commands to
just use `$SAGE_ROOT/local/lib/*.so`?
This is a useless regression, although it seems the patch has meanwhile
changed, and the changes are less poor now.
If you want to "simplify" `module_list.py` by factoring out the libraries
'''Singular''' (i.e. `libsingular`) requires, as he probably intended,
then put '''these''' libraries into `singular_libs`, and nothing else.
[[BR]]
> The next version of Singular will split into multiple libraries and any
effort trying to minimize the number of linked libraries now is going to
be wasted.
That's totally unrelated.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10903#comment:48>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
