#11892: Extend singular_function to non-commutative polynomial rings
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  SimonKing  |          Owner:  AlexGhitza
       Type:  defect     |         Status:  new       
   Priority:  major      |      Milestone:  sage-4.7.2
  Component:  algebra    |       Keywords:            
Work_issues:             |       Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:             |         Author:            
     Merged:             |   Dependencies:  #4539     
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Changes (by SimonKing):

  * type:  PLEASE CHANGE => defect


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:3 PolyBoRi]:
 > There is a function called {{{is_sage_wrapper_for_singular_ring}}} in
 the plural patch.
 > The comment says that it's broken (for whatever reason).
 > Shouldn't it be the right place for this check?

 Looking at the code, I don't understand why it doesn't work.

 However, I have to think how to organise work. Things to do involve

  * refactoring sage.rings.polynomial.plural (define rings and elements in
 separate modules).
  * deriving `NCPolynomialRing_plural` from `MPolynomialRing_libsingular`.
 That would suffice to fix this ticket.
  * Implement quotients of multivariate polynomial rings and of g-algebras
 (#11878)

 These three "to-do"s are closely linked.

 Do I understand correctly that generally it is better to have several
 smaller tickets, rather than one big ticket?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11892#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to