#10973: Integral points on elliptic curves over number fields
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  justin           |          Owner:  cremona                       
                  
       Type:  enhancement      |         Status:  positive_review               
                  
   Priority:  major            |      Milestone:                                
                  
  Component:  elliptic curves  |       Keywords:  sd32                          
                  
Work_issues:                   |       Upstream:  N/A                           
                  
   Reviewer:                   |         Author:  Justin Walker, Aly Deines, 
Jennifer Balakrishnan
     Merged:                   |   Dependencies:                                
                  
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Changes (by cremona):

  * status:  needs_review => positive_review


Old description:

> Incorporate work done by Rado Kirov and Jackie Anderson at Sage Days 22,
> based on Magma implementation by Cremona's student Nook.

New description:

 Incorporate work done by Rado Kirov and Jackie Anderson at Sage Days 22,
 based on Magma implementation by Cremona's student Nook.

 Apply only Trac10973.7.patch

--

Comment:

 Positive review.  In my reviewer's patch I fix  the following:

     0. Now applies to 4.7.2 with no fuzz.
     1. Added QQ to import list on line 332 of ell_number_field.py,
 otherwise testing ell_int_pts failed, but testing ell_number_field did not
 -- since the test for that function silverman_height_bounds was
 incomplete!  I fixed that too.
     2. Fixed a warning in docbuild by adding a blank line at line 69 of
 the same file.

 It is now true that for an elliptic curve E over Q we have both the new
 E.silverman_height_bounds(), which gives lower and upper bounds, and the
 old E.silverman_height_bound(), which only gives one of them.  The latter
 can be deleted but that will require some tweaking of any code which uses
 it.  I have left that for another ticket.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10973#comment:19>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to