#10164: Few digits of precision in N().
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
   Reporter:  gerbicz              |          Owner:  jason                     
                 
       Type:  defect               |         Status:  needs_work                
                 
   Priority:  major                |      Milestone:  sage-4.8                  
                 
  Component:  misc                 |       Keywords:  N, digits, numerical 
approximation beginner
Work_issues:                       |       Upstream:  N/A                       
                 
   Reviewer:  Karl-Dieter Crisman  |         Author:  Robert Gerbicz, Douglas 
McNeil             
     Merged:                       |   Dependencies:                            
                 
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):

  * status:  needs_review => needs_work
  * reviewer:  => Karl-Dieter Crisman
  * milestone:  => sage-4.8


Comment:

 > I think it's a step in the right direction, anyhow.
 Very clever testing.

 Very minor 'needs work' issues:
  * I think you could also add as a doctest the example at #12163 (a dup,
 more or less).  We do like doctesting problems people officially put on
 tickets.  That sort of example has the added benefit of being a little
 easier to read :) Of course, if more than one person disagrees, it's not a
 big deal.
  * Needs to be done - your doc lines are really long.  Compare
 {{{
 s_real -- a string that defines a real number (or something whose
 }}}
    to
 {{{
 Make sure we've rounded up log(10,2) enough to guarantee sufficient
 precision (trac #10164).
 }}}
    Try to shorten those puppies up to the 80-character limit (if I recall
 correctly) for fine terminal viewing.

 Because this has the potential to do weird things to doctests, I'm not
 going to give positive review in any case until I run long tests.  But
 looks good other than those tiny issues.

 Also, a question: I assume it's okay (and already the case, in fact) that
 we have MORE digits than "officially requested" by the user.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10164#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to