#10785: Setting solver-specific options
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
   Reporter:  ncohen              |          Owner:  ncohen       
       Type:  enhancement         |         Status:  needs_review 
   Priority:  major               |      Milestone:  sage-4.8     
  Component:  linear programming  |       Keywords:               
Work_issues:                      |       Upstream:  N/A          
   Reviewer:                      |         Author:  Nathann Cohen
     Merged:                      |   Dependencies:               
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------

Comment(by fichtejo):

 The lastest developper's version does not work for me. I have an build
 issue on ubuntu, so we have to postpone that one.

 A short (hopefully better) description of the problem above:[[BR]]The code
 online linked in trac is the latest developper's code, is't it?

 When we create a new instance of a MixedIntegerLinearProgram (see
 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/browser/sage/numerical/mip.pyx#L200)
 like

 {{{
 p = MixedIntegerLinearProgram(maximization=True)
 }}}
 ''', '''we call

 {{{
 get_solver(solver=solver, constraint_generation=constraint_generation)
 }}}
 Then '''get_solver'''(...) checks for a solver (e.g. CPLEX see
 
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/browser/sage/numerical/backends/generic_backend.pyx#L90),
 but the solver is required to be a string, not an instance of a solver.

 Since MixedIntegerLinearProgram uses get_solver to obtain a solver,
 get_solver requires a string in the input, and the backend is hidden in
 the !MixedIntegerLinearProgram, we will never be able to use the solver
 with special parameters in an instance of MixedIntegerLinearProgramm, e.g:

 {{{
 my_solver = get_solver(solver = "CPLEX")
 my_solver.solver_parameter("timelimit", 60)
 p = MixedIntegerLinearProgram(solver=my_solver)
 }}}
 will fail. I do not see this addressed in the patch.

 But I may be mistaken?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10785#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to