#8162: p-adic ring constructor documentation incorrect
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: dmharvey | Owner: roed
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.8
Component: padics | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author: David Roe
Merged: | Dependencies:
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment(by roed):
Yeah, that was a typo: apply only 8162.2.patch.
I can't think of a good reason to allow a list, but also no particular
reason not to allow it, since lists are a common container for objects in
Python. :-)
As for the check parameter, my interpretation of check=False is that it
only accepts input of a particular format in order to minimize the time
spent in handling different input formats. So I think it's completely
reasonable for your example to fail when you don't pass in something of
the form [(p, k)].
So I guess my conclusion is that I don't think the issues you're pointing
out are problems.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8162#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
