#11521: Memleak when resolving the action of Integers on an Elliptic Curve
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jpflori | Owner: robertwb
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.8
Component: coercion | Keywords: sd35
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author: Simon King
Merged: | Dependencies: #11900 #715
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment(by SimonKing):
Hi Jean-Pierre,
indeed, you found the correct ticket.
And there is no need to ask on sage-nt, since I already did before opening
#11474: [http://groups.google.com/group/sage-
nt/browse_thread/thread/ec8d0ad14a819082/049bfad6fd0680d1 Sage-nt] first
seemed to agree that uniqueness is good, so I opened the ticket. But then,
they became convinced that much of the elliptic curve stuff depends on
choices (generators), so that we should consider elliptic curves to be
mutable objects, for which we wouldn't like to have uniqueness.
Considering the discussion on sage-nt, #11474 probably is "wontfix".
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11521#comment:68>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
