#715: Parents probably not reclaimed due to too much caching
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  robertwb  |          Owner:  somebody           
       Type:  defect    |         Status:  needs_review       
   Priority:  major     |      Milestone:  sage-4.8           
  Component:  coercion  |       Keywords:  weak cache coercion
Work_issues:            |       Upstream:  N/A                
   Reviewer:            |         Author:  Simon King         
     Merged:            |   Dependencies:  #9138, #11900      
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------

Comment(by jpflori):

 Testing sage.schemes with only one core gave me:

  * 1526.0 sec on vanilla


  * 1538.8 sec on vanilla +
 [http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/search/opensearch?q=ticket%3A715 #715]



 This is more than acceptable according to me (if it does reflect
 anything... it might only be random stuff).

 Running five tests of sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.padic_lseries gave me:

  * 51.0, 48.7, 47.0, 47.0, 47.1 on vanilla


  * 49.0, 47.2, 48.4, 47.4, 47.7 on vanilla +
 [http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/search/opensearch?q=ticket%3A715 #715]



 Still surprising that I don't find any slow-down as you did, but I might
 also be good news :)

 My next step is to check for the memory leaks (same j invariant, different
 j invariants, finite field example of Paul in
 [http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/search/opensearch?q=ticket%3A11521
 #11521] ? or do that last one need a patch for the
 [http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/search/opensearch?q=wiki%3AHomSet
 HomSet] cache ? if this is the case it won't prevent this ticket to be
 closed, but should be treated in
 [http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/search/opensearch?q=ticket%3A11521
 #11521], otherwise
 [http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/search/opensearch?q=ticket%3A11521
 #11521] can be closed as duplicate) and that action do not get
 continuously deleted.

 Afterward, I'll properly review your code and examples (that I've already
 seen many times obviously :)).

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/715#comment:102>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to