#12185: Bug in norm for orders of relative number fields
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
    Reporter:  johanbosman    |         Owner:  davidloeffler                 
        Type:  defect         |        Status:  closed                        
    Priority:  major          |     Milestone:  sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
   Component:  number fields  |    Resolution:  duplicate                     
    Keywords:  sd35           |   Work_issues:                                
    Upstream:  N/A            |      Reviewer:  David Loeffler                
      Author:                 |        Merged:                                
Dependencies:                 |  
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Changes (by jdemeyer):

  * status:  positive_review => closed
  * resolution:  => duplicate


Old description:

> {{{
> sage: K.<a,b> = NumberField([x^2 - 2, x^3 - 2])
> sage: OK = K.maximal_order()
> sage: OK(b).norm()
> ...
> AttributeError: 'RelativeOrder' object has no attribute 'pari_polynomial'
> }}}
>
> '''Now fixed, please close as duplicate.'''

New description:

 {{{
 sage: K.<a,b> = NumberField([x^2 - 2, x^3 - 2])
 sage: OK = K.maximal_order()
 sage: OK(b).norm()
 ...
 AttributeError: 'RelativeOrder' object has no attribute 'pari_polynomial'
 }}}

 Duplicate, fixed by #11904.

--

Comment:

 Cool, my patch #11904 fixed a bug by accident.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12185#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to