#11888: Sage is missing the lambert_w function conversion from Maxima
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  benjaminfjones  |          Owner:  burcin                         
             
       Type:  defect          |         Status:  needs_review                   
             
   Priority:  minor           |      Milestone:  sage-4.8                       
             
  Component:  symbolics       |       Keywords:  lambert_w symbolics conversion 
maxima sd35.5
Work_issues:                  |       Upstream:  N/A                            
             
   Reviewer:                  |         Author:  Benjamin Jones                 
             
     Merged:                  |   Dependencies:                                 
             
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------

Comment(by kini):

 I spread it across lines because 1) I was trying to keep within the
 recommended PEP 8 guidelines for line length, and 2) because of this

 {{{
 [2012-01-10 22:54:53] <kini> while I was fixing the second doctest, some
 weird
 stuff started happening to vim
 [2012-01-10 22:55:02] <kini> I thought my terminal had frozen or something
 [2012-01-10 22:56:02] <kini> but it turns out that apparently opening a
 new line
 after a line with a 1800-character-long Sage symbolic expression on it
 causes
 vim to take a full 12 seconds to compute the correct indentation level for
 the
 next line
 [2012-01-10 22:56:20] <benjaminfjones> ha!
 [2012-01-10 22:56:30] <kini> on a 4.5 GHz Core i5-2500K and utilizing
 three
 cores!
 [2012-01-10 22:56:39] <benjaminfjones> wow
 }}}

 What is inappropriate about adding line breaks?

 As for the length of the expression, it seems to be a fluke. With the
 patches applied, starting with random seeds other than `2` gives
 expressions of a more "normal" length.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11888#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to