#11888: Sage is missing the lambert_w function conversion from Maxima
-------------------------------------------------------------------+--------
   Reporter:  benjaminfjones                                       |          
Owner:  burcin                                      
       Type:  defect                                               |         
Status:  needs_work                                  
   Priority:  minor                                                |      
Milestone:  sage-5.0                                    
  Component:  symbolics                                            |       
Keywords:  lambert_w symbolics conversion maxima sd35.5
Work_issues:  add second parameter, RDF/CDF stuff                  |       
Upstream:  N/A                                         
   Reviewer:  Keshav Kini, Karl-Dieter Crisman, Fredrik Johansson  |         
Author:  Benjamin Jones                              
     Merged:                                                       |   
Dependencies:                                              
-------------------------------------------------------------------+--------
Changes (by kcrisman):

  * status:  needs_review => needs_work
  * reviewer:  => Keshav Kini, Karl-Dieter Crisman, Fredrik Johansson
  * work_issues:  => add second parameter, RDF/CDF stuff


Comment:

 Nice; I wonder if there are more places we are beginning to default to
 mpmath where !SciPy could be useful for the double fields.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11888#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to