#12353: wrong comparison between RealIntervalField and RealField
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  zimmerma          |          Owner:  AlexGhitza
       Type:  defect            |         Status:  new       
   Priority:  blocker           |      Milestone:  sage-5.0  
  Component:  basic arithmetic  |       Keywords:            
Work_issues:                    |       Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:                    |         Author:            
     Merged:                    |   Dependencies:            
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Comment(by zimmerma):

 still wrong with Sage 5.0.beta1 on a 64-bit Core 2 under Ubuntu 10.10 (gcc
 4.4.5):
 {{{
 tarte% ./sage
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 | Sage Version 5.0.beta1, Release Date: 2012-01-22                   |
 | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.        |
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 **********************************************************************
 *                                                                    *
 * Warning: this is a prerelease version, and it may be unstable.     *
 *                                                                    *
 **********************************************************************
 sage: RealIntervalField(53)(-1) > RR(1)
 False
 sage: RealIntervalField(54)(-1) > RR(1)
 True
 }}}
 Paul

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12353#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to