#12318: **kwds in the Graph constructor is confusing
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Reporter: brunellus | Owner: jason, ncohen, rlm
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: graph theory | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: | Dependencies:
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Changes (by ncohen):
* status: needs_work => positive_review
Old description:
> The possibility of using any argument in the Graph constructor without an
> error is very confusing, see #10441 for some example. Is the universal
> **kwds argument necessary?
New description:
The possibility of using any argument in the Graph constructor without an
error is very confusing, see #10441 for some example. Is the universal
**kwds argument necessary?
Apply:
* [attachment:trac_12318_removing_kwds.3.patch]
--
Comment:
After another review and looooooong tests on Sage, this patch can go !
`:-)`
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12318#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
