#12015: L-series attached to general Euler products
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: was
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: number theory | Keywords: sd35.5
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: | Dependencies:
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment(by was):
The patch trac_12015-part1_updated.patch has some issues:
1. It patches a file called
{{{sage/lfunctions/eulerprod_with_tripleprod.py}}} that is not even in my
patch. I'm guessing you took some old file from Sage days I had provided
and started working on it. However, that has little to do with the code
in the patch I posted to this ticket.
2. Why was this change made?
{{{
118 sage: K.<a> = NumberField(x^2-x-1)
119 sage: K.<a> = NumberField(x^2+1)
}}}
3. The code needs to be indented here, but isn't (in your patch):
{{{
174 EXAMPLES::
175
176 sage: from sage.lfunctions.eulerprod import
LSeries
177 sage: from sage.lfunctions.eulerprod import
LSeriesDerivative
178 sage: K.<a>=NumberField(x^2+1)
179 sage: L=LSeries(K); L
}}}
4. Here in your patch the code is indented (good), but there is only
one colon (instead of two) after EXAMPLES:
{{{
508 EXAMPLES:
509
510 sage: from sage.lfunctions.eulerprod import
LSeriesAbstract
511 sage: L1 = LSeriesAbstract(conductor=1,
hodge_numbers=[0], weight=1, epsilon=1, poles=[1], residues=[-1],
base_field=QQ)
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12015#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
