#9130: Access to beta function
------------------------------------------------------------------+---------
   Reporter:  kcrisman                                            |          
Owner:  burcin                                           
       Type:  enhancement                                         |         
Status:  needs_review                                     
   Priority:  major                                               |      
Milestone:  sage-5.0                                         
  Component:  symbolics                                           |       
Keywords:  special function, pynac, sd35.5 Cernay2012       
Work_issues:                                                      |       
Upstream:  N/A                                              
   Reviewer:  Benjamin Jones, Burcin Erocal, Karl-Dieter Crisman  |         
Author:  Karen T. Kohl, Burcin Erocal, Karl-Dieter Crisman
     Merged:                                                      |   
Dependencies:  #4498                                            
------------------------------------------------------------------+---------

Comment(by burcin):

 Replying to [comment:37 benjaminfjones]:
 > I rebased the patches against #4498. This meant moving the changes to
 `sage/symbolic/random_tests.py` out of
 [attachment:trac_9130_beta_function.patch] and into a new patch
 [attachment:trac_9130-random-tests.patch] that reflects the differences in
 the random tests after #4498 was applied and `beta` was added.

 Thank you for taking care of this.

 > The tests in `random_test.py` are getting annoying. Now #9130 must
 depend on #4498 and in turn my #11888 must depend on #9130, etc. To finish
 #11143, I need to rebase the changes to `random_tests.py` to all 3 of
 these other symbolics patches.
 >
 > Would it make sense to open a new ticket for changes needed to
 `random_tests.py` after all the new symbolic functions are added that will
 go into sage-5.0? This new ticket would depend on all the other tickets
 adding new functions. This way we wouldn't have to fix the random tests
 like this in every ticket that adds a new function, just *once* per
 release.

 At this stage I'd be happy to mark that test in `random_tests.py` with a
 `#random` tag so the doctesting framework ignores the output. If you open
 a new ticket for this and provide a patch, I promise a quick positive
 review. :)

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9130#comment:39>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to