#8659: another broken square root simplification
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: burcin | Owner: burcin
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: symbolics | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author: Burcin Erocal
Merged: | Dependencies: #12511
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Comment(by kcrisman):
> On another note... IMHO, a simple typo in comments within source code,
or not documenting which doctest corresponds to which branch in the code
is justification to switch a ticket to `needs_work`. You might not be
satisfied with the work, but it is
Fair enough! Though I do think typos are 'needs work', often I can update
them on a refresh. The doctest thing was just wanting to check that we
*did* check all branches. Maybe 'needs info' is better? The point is
that I want to make sure the comment gets seen; a lot of times I see
questions on 'needs review' that are then never actually addressed. I
don't really care what the status itself is.
> possible that someone else will give a positive review, especially since
this is a `critical` ticket.
Well, it's apparently been `critical` for nearly two years, so perhaps
that is less convincing of an argument on this ticket than others. But
point taken in general!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8659#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
