#10682: sum fails with lower bound != 0 or 1 (upgrade maxima to 5.26)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: fmaltey
| Owner: burcin
Type: defect
| Status: needs_work
Priority: critical
| Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: symbolics
| Keywords:
Work_issues: several doctests need to be patched due to changes in output
format/term order | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer:
| Author:
Merged:
| Dependencies:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comment(by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:24 jpflori]:
> As far as the Sage patch is concerned, it would be nice to limit the
length of code lines to 79 characters.
>
> For example, in sage/symbolic/relation.py you corrected the output but
put everything on one line, which is not very readable in 80 char
terminals.
oops, OK, I somehow had trouble splitting lines, and thought that the
doctests framework doesn't quite allow this.
What is the syntax? Will it just ignore '\n', anywhere ?
>
> The error in f.nintegal() should definitely raise an Error. Letting it
output of tuple of reals is wrong. I'll try to locate where this should
take place if you have no time or no idea.
Are you saying that this "error code"=6 is a new addition in Maxima, and
is not properly handled by the Sage interface?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10682#comment:26>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
