#11615: optional doctests: clean up and document "known bug", "optional:
requires
PKG"
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: jhpalmieri | Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: doctest | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Karl-Dieter Crisman | Author: John Palmieri
Merged: | Dependencies:
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* status: needs_review => needs_info
* reviewer: => Karl-Dieter Crisman
Comment:
I like this, and it still applies!
Here is something to ask. Could have two `if` statements (instead of
some sort of `elif` or something) cause trouble if a doctest was marked as
optional ''and'' a bug? I've tried to make something break, but I'm not
sure if this is the "right" behavior or not. Here is my example.
Adding doctest
{{{
sage: 2+2 # optional -- known bug
5
}}}
to a file gives
{{{
$ ../../sage -t -only-optional=known,bug
../../devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression_conversions.py
sage -t -only-optional=known,bug
"devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression_conversions.py"
[0.1 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 0.1 seconds
}}}
and the same happens with `-only-optional=bug`, but it fails (correctly)
with `-optional`.
Otherwise the patch seems fine, and doc looks good (''naturally''!).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11615#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
